# integration of polynomial

## Primary tabs

Type of Math Object:
Theorem
Major Section:
Reference

## Mathematics Subject Classification

26A42 no label found

## Comments

### TeX error

I am uncertain what is wrong with the TeX code I have put in. I will try to correct it as soon as possible. For now, hopefully you can tell how the proof is supposed to go from the TeX code.

### Re: TeX error

One problem is that the brackets don't match in the following fragment

\frac{B_{n+1-l}{n+1}(t+1)^l

There are a lot of = signs sitting outside maths environments as well, these ought to go inside the $...$s. And it would be better style to use a theorem/proof environment rather than \mathbf{Theorem: }

Also the comma ending the very last displayed equation: is that supposed to be there?

### Re: TeX error

Thanks for the \frac correction. Those types are the hardest for me to see. The = ended up outside of the \$'s because I tried to use eqnarray and failed miserably, and I forgot to fix it afterwards. In any case, I'm glad that I finally got this debugged to the point that other people can read the html. Thanks.

### no more \mathbf{Theorem:}!

A long time ago, silverfish wrote:

> And it would be better style to use a theorem/proof
> environment rather than \mathbf{Theorem: }

Others have made similar comments.

Probably to the sheer delight of all of those nagging me about this, I am going back through and changing all of these.

The main reason that I was using \mathbf{Theorem:} was that I could not figure out how to suppress the numbering in the theorem/proof environment. To me, using the obscure \mathbf{Theorem:} was a far lesser evil than having numbered theorems in entries that contained only one theorem. Now that I have asterisks everywhere, life is good. :-)

### Re: no more \mathbf{Theorem:}!

I am sheerly delighted :)